Government vows to jail asylum seekers for steering dinghies across English Channel despite UN warning

The government has vowed to jail asylum seekers for steering their own dinghies across the English Channel, claiming they could face life sentences.

It is pressing ahead with the plans despite a warning from the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) that such prosecutions could violate the Refugee Convention and should not happen.

Ministers have been forced to change the law to allow the controversial charges, after judges ruled that it is not currently illegal to pilot boats to the UK in order to claim asylum.

The Home Office has not publicly acknowledged the ruling or apologised to at least 12 innocent asylum seekers who were wrongly jailed for steering dinghies between 2019 and 2021.

The Court of Appeal is expected to quash more convictions, after identifying a fundamental “error of law” that originated in the Home Office, then spread to prosecutors and the courts.

Laura Padoan, a spokesperson for the UNHCR, told The Independent: “A passenger who assists in steering a boat, either under duress or to ensure safe passage, and for no financial gain, is not a smuggler and should not be prosecuted as such.

“It is deeply concerning that the Nationality and Borders Bill currently before parliament would change the law specifically to criminalise people who claim asylum as soon as they arrive in the UK, a move that could result in a violation of article 31 of the 1951 Refugee Convention.

“The right to seek asylum is universal and is not dependent on the way in which someone arrives in the country.”

Addressing parliament on Tuesday, Priti Patel said the new laws and a deal struck to send asylum seekers to Rwanda were based on “fairness” and necessary to combat people smuggling.

“Every small boat incident will be investigated to determine who piloted the boat and could therefore be liable for prosecution,” the home secretary added.

“The long-term impact has to be breaking up the evil people-smuggling gangs and going after them with more prosecutions, making sure the pilots of those small boats are prosecuted.”

The Court of Appeal heard that asylum seekers previously jailed as “pilots” were not paid for steering the dinghies they travelled to the UK on, and were not part of organised crime groups.

Some of them said they had been pressured or threatened to steer, while others took the helm to stop boats sinking and tried to call authorities and flag down passing ships.

In response to questions from The Independent, the Home Office admitted that fresh prosecutions are dependent on the Nationality and Borders Bill being passed.

It would change the law on illegal entry to mean that anyone arriving in British waters without “valid entry clearance” commits an offence and can be jailed for up to four years.

That would allow prosecutions of asylum seekers who are intercepted in the Channel, and mean those steering the boats can be prosecuted for “assisting unlawful immigration” – with a new maximum sentence of life imprisonment.

The clause on illegal entry was changed by the House of Lords after peers including the former Lord Chief Justice said the plans would break international law, and will have to be re-inserted by MPs for a second time.

The bill also increases the sentence for the crime of assisting the unlawful immigration of an asylum seeker to life, and removes the current requirement for defendants to have acted for profit or gain.

A Home Office spokesperson said: “Under measures in the Nationality and Borders Bill, every small boat incident will be examined to determine who has been piloting the boat.

Related Articles

Bir cavab yazın

Sizin e-poçt ünvanınız dərc edilməyəcəkdir. Gərəkli sahələr * ilə işarələnmişdir

Back to top button