The US Supreme Court has ended constitutional protections for abortion care, marking a stark reversal of bodily autonomy protections in America that could force women to carry pregnancies to term or seek abortion care in states or countries where it is protected, and lead to far-reaching and potentially life-threatening consequences for millions of Americans.
Five conservative justices, who now make up a majority on the nine-member court, have ruled in favour of a Mississippi law that outlaws abortion at 15 weeks of pregnancy while also overturning key precedents established by the landmark 1973 decision in Roe v Wade as well as an affirming decision in 1992’s Planned Parenthood v Casey.
The Roe decision affirmed constitutional protections for abortion care up to 23 or 24 weeks of pregnancy, while the Casey ruling sought to prohibit states from placing an “undue burden” on abortion access.
A decision from the nation’s high court on 24 June ends 50 years of federal protections for abortion access and leaves it up to states to determine whether to ban the procedure – which could quickly become criminalised or effectively outlawed in roughly half the US.
Writing for the court’s majority, conservative Justice Samuel Alito claims that the Roe decision was “egregiously wrong from the start.”
The Roe decision relied on protections in the 14th Amendment, drafted in the Reconstruction-era aftermath of the US Civil War, that prohibits states from “[depriving] any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law” – granting so-called “unenumerated” rights such as the right to privacy and freedom from government intervention in profoundly intimate medical decisions that are not explicitly identified in the Constitution.
Justice Alito’s opinion states that abortion rights are not “rooted in the nation’s history and tradition” and not “mentioned” in the Constitution, therefore illegitimate, though that list, which even he acknowledges, is extensive – including the right to obtain contraception or marry a person of another race or sex.
Scholars have warned that a ruling to undermine Roe could compel right-wing legal efforts to strike down LGBT+ rights, marriage equality and marital benefits, the rights to public education, and attempts to revisit critical civil rights decisions that relied on 14th Amendment protections.
The court’s decision could constrain far-reaching consequences, from the withdrawal of physicians in states where abortion care is severely restricted to the closure of clinics that provide other reproductive health services.
Hundreds of physicians, medical groups and abortion rights organisations have condemned the decision, warning of the severe long-term consequences of carrying unwanted or medically unsafe pregnancies.
Opponents also have warned that patients and providers could face the risk of prosecution for ending their pregnancies in states where abortion will be outlawed, as well as the possibile criminalisation of miscarriages and in vitro fertilisations and obstacles to obtaining certain forms of birth control and contraception.
The Roe ruling “was on a collision course with the Constitution from the day it was decided,” according to Justice Alito.
“With sorrow – for this Court, but more, for the many millions of American women who have today lost a fundamental constitutional protection – we dissent,” reads a dissenting opinion from Justices Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor. “It is truly sad.”
A Supreme Court decision to undo the Roe ruling has long been the ambition of a so-called “pro-life” movement that has radically changed how many Americans talk or learn about abortion access, rallying “single-issue” voters into a powerful Republican base while drafting state-level legislation and promoting anti-abortion figures that enabled the political environment to end Roe.
“It is a victory [for the movement], and it also poses the more difficult question about what’s next,” according to Florida State University College of Law professor Mary Ziegler, author of Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v Wade to the Present and forthcoming Dollars for Life: The Antiabortion Movementand the Fall of the Republican Establishment.
“It’s a lot easier to be in the opposition than it is to be the person in a position to actually do something,” she told The Independent last month. “Now you’re going to see anti-abortion groups in the states give us a sense of, ‘What does it actually mean to be pro-life?’ Does it mean you just put people in jail for [performing] abortions or having abortions, or is there more to it than that?”
Justice Alito’s opinion suggests Roe has inflamed political divides, appearing to paint anti-abortion proponents as victims within a long-running cultural and political battle that “what’s wrong with American politics somehow has to do with Roe,” according to Ms Ziegler.
Despite growing consensus among Americans in support of protecting abortion access, conservative legislators have enacted sweeping restrictions on abortion care.
In 2022, a wave of anti-abortion legislation in Republican-led states anticipating the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision proposed eliminating abortion access in most cases and criminalising abortion care by making it a felony for providers to see abortion patients.
